تأثیر سیاق در شکل‌گیری طرحواره‌های فرهنگی زبان شخصیت‌های داستان فارسی شکر است

نوع مقاله : علمی-پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 کاندیدای دکتری زبان‌شناسی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران
2 دانشیار زبان‌شناسی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران
چکیده
طرحوارۀ فرهنگی یکی از ابزارهای اصلی زبان‌شناسی فرهنگی است و می‌توان آن را پایه‌ای برای تعامل کنش‌های گفتاری و درک گفتار دانست. طرحوارۀ فرهنگی، مستلزم پیش‌فرض‌ها و انتظارات فرهنگی است. تا به امروز در تحلیل‌ها و مقالات مختلف به ‌این مسئله پرداخته شده که ‌این ملیت است که طرحواره‌های زبانی و طرحواره‌های فرهنگی را شکل می‌دهد، اما تاکنون تأثیر سیاق و لحن در شکل‌گیری طرحواره‌های فرهنگی مورد بررسی قرار نگرفته است. در پژوهش حاضر، به شیوۀ توصیفی-تحلیلی به بررسی طرحواره‌های فرهنگی و کنش‌های گفتاری سه شخصیت‌ ایرانی به مثابه مشارکان گفتگو در داستان فارسی شکر است (جمالزاده، 1300) می‌پردازیم. هر یک از ‌این مشارکان گفتگو از طرحوارۀ متفاوتی استفاده می‌کند. کاربرد طرحواره‌های فرهنگی متفاوت، سبب مفهوم‌سازی‌های متفاوتی در مشارکان می‌شود. شخصیتی که در معرض فرهنگ و زبان دوم و یا زبان مذهب قرار نگرفته‌ است، نمی‌تواند طرحوارۀ فرهنگی و تک‌مفهوم‌های سایر مشارکان گفتگو را دریابد. نتیجۀ این پژوهش نشان می‌دهد که علاوه بر ملیت، سیاق متفاوت و تماس فرهنگی نیز طرحواره‌های فرهنگی متفاوت‌ ایجاد می‌کنند. افزون بر‌ این، طرحواره‌های فرهنگی زبان دوم بر زبان اول تأثیر می‌گذارد و آنها را تغییر می‌دهد.
کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

The impact of register on the cultural schemas of the language of characters in a Persian story, Farsi Shekar ast

نویسندگان English

Pajand Soleymani Karimabad 1
Raheleh Gandomkar 2
1 Faculty of Persian Literature and Foreign Languages, Allameh Tabataba'i University
2 Faculty of Persian Literature and Foreign Languages, Allameh Tabataba'i University
چکیده English

The cultural schema is one of the main tools of cultural linguistics and it can be considered as a basis for the interaction of speech acts and speech understanding. The cultural scheme requires cultural presuppositions and expectations. Until now, in various analyzes and articles, it has been discussed that nationality shapes linguistic schemas as well as cultural schemas, but the influence of register and style in the formation of cultural schemas has not been addressed so far. In the present study, we will investigate the cultural schemas and speech acts of three Iranian characters as participants in the story Farsi Shekar ast (Jamalzadeh, 1300) using a descriptive-analytical method. Each of the conversation participants uses a different schema. The use of different cultural schemas causes different conceptualizations in language participants. A character who has not been exposed to a second culture and language, or the language of religion, does not understand the cultural schema and pragma of other dialogue participants. The conclusion of this research shows that in addition to nationality, different register and cultural contact also create different cultural schemas. The cultural schemas of the second language affect the first language and change them.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

cultural schema
cultural contact
speech act
Farsi shekar ast
register
جمالزاده، محمدعلی. (1378). برگزیدۀ آثار محمدعلی جمالزاده. چ4. به کوشش علی دهباشی. تهران: انتشارات سخن.
معین درباری، مریم و پهلوان‌نژاد، محمدرضا  (1395). «چرخش سیاق و پیامدهای معنایی آن در مدیر مدرسۀ جلال آل‌احمد». پژوهش‌های ادبی. ۱۳ (۵۱) :۱۳۱-۱۴۶.
نوبخت، محسن. (1400). «بررسی نقش طرحوارۀ فرهنگی و طرح‏وارۀ زبانی بر درک خوانداری و شنیداری زبان‌آموزان زبان انگلیسی». روان‌شناسی فرهنگی. 5(2): 63-77.
Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology. Cambridge University Press.
Baumann, V., & Ho, C. K. (2017). On Formalisms and Interpretations. Quantum, 2, 99. https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2018-10-15-99
Bobrow, D. G., & Norman, D. A. (1975). Some Principles of Memory Schemata. In D. Bobrow & E. A. Thelen (Eds.), Representation and Understanding: Studies in Cognitive Science (pp. 131-149). Academic Press.
Bracken, B. A. (2013). Fundamental psychometric considerations in assessment. In I. B. Weiner, J. R. Graham, & J. A. Naglieri (Eds.), Handbook of Psychology: Assessment Psychology (2nd ed., pp. 50-80). John Wiley & Sons, Inc
Brewer, W. F. (1980). Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 33–58). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cook, G. (1994). Discourse and literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
D’Andrade, R. G. (1995). The development of cognitive anthropology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139166645
Di Maggio, P. (1997). “Culture and Cognition.” Annual Review of Sociology 32, no. 1: 263-87.
Edgell, P., & Hull, K. E. (2017). Cultural Schemas of Religion, Science, and Law in Talk About Social Controversies. Sociological Forum, 32(2), 298-320. http-s://doi.org/10.1111/socf.12331
Frank, R. M. (2008). The language-organism-species analogy: A complex adaptive systems approach to shifting perspectives on ‘language’. In R. M. Frank, R. Dirven, T. Ziemke, & E. Bernárdez (Eds.), Body, language and mind: Vol. 2. Sociocultural situatedness (pp. 215–262). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110199116.2.215
Gelman, R. (2000). “Domain Specificity and Variability in Cognitive Development.” Child Development 71, no. 4: 854-956.
Gelman, S. A. (2010). “Modules, Theories, or Islands of Expertise? Domain Specificity in Socialization.” Child Development 81, no. 3 (May/June): 715-19.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M.A.K., & Hasan, R. (1989). Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Holland, A. C., & Kuhl, P. K. (1995). Mapping the perceptual magnet effect for speech using signal detection theory and multidimensional scaling. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97(1), 553-562. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.412280
Homan, P., Valentino, L., & Weed, E. (2017). Being and Becoming Poor: How Cultural Schemas Shape Beliefs About Poverty. Social Forces, 95(3), 1023-1048.
House, J., & J. Rehbein (Eds.). (2004). Multilingual communication. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hunzaker, M. B. F., & L. Valentino (2019). Mapping Cultural Schemas: From Theory to Method. In American Sociological Review (Vol. 84, Issue 5, pp. 950–981). SAGE Publications.
Lawson, T. (2000). Critical Ethical Naturalism: An Orientation to Ethics. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 17(2), 155-166. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5930.00154
Lin, M.-C., Zhang, Y. B., & Harwood, J. (2004). Taiwanese young adults’ intergenerational communication schemas. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 19(3), 321-342.
Malcolm, I. G. (2017). Terms of adoption: Cultural conceptual factors underlying the adoption of English for Aboriginal communication. In F. Sharifian (Ed.), Advances in Cultural Linguistics (pp. 625–659). Singapore: Springer Nature. doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-4056-6_28
Mbiti, J. S. (2015). African Religions and Philosophy. 2nd ed. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
Meléndez, M., Cortés, D. E., & Amaro, H. (2011). Acceptability and Cultural Fit of Spiritual Self-Schema Therapy for Puerto Rican Women with Addiction Disorders: Qualitative Findings
Minsky, M. (1975). A Framework for Representing Knowledge. In P. H. Winston (Ed.), The Psychology of Computer Vision (pp. 211-277). McGraw-Hill.
Mousa, M. O., & Ali, B. F. (2022). The Role of Cultural Schemata in Learning English Language Skills. In Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Research (Vol. 1, Issue 1).
Nishida, H. (2005). "Cultural Schema Theory". In Theorizing about Intercultural Communication, edited William B. Gudyhunst, 401-18. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Okpara, M. L., F. L. Hord, & J. S. Lee (eds.) (2016). "I Am Because We Are". Readings in Africana Philosophy. Amhurst, MA: Massachusetts University Press.
Pyysiäinen, I. (2003). True fiction: Philosophy and psychology of religious belief. Philosophical Psychology, 16, 109–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951508032000067716
Rumelhart, D. E. (1980). Schemata: The Building Blocks of Cognition. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. E. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension (pp. 33-58). Erlbaum Associates.
Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., Williams, R. J., & McClelland, J. L. (Eds.). (1986). Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 7-58). MIT Press.
Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding: An Inquiry into Human Knowledge Structures. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Sharifian, F. (2001). Schema-based processing in Australian speakers of Aboriginal English. Language and Intercultural Communication, 1(2), 120–134. doi: 10.1080/14708470108668068
Sharifian, F., & M. Jamarani (2011). Cultural schemas in intercultural communication: A study of the Persian cultural schema of sharmandegi ‘being ashamed.’ In Intercultural Pragmatics (Vol. 8, Issue 2). Walter de Gruyter GmbH.
Sharifian, F. (2017). Cultural Linguistics: Cultural conceptualizations and language. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Sharifian, F., Chalak, A., & Dehkordi, Z. (2019). The Persian Cultural Schema: Compliment Response Strategies on Social Networking SitesAmong Persian EFL Learners. The Journal of Applied Linguistics and Applied Literature: Dynamics and Advances, Online First.
Silzer, S. T. (2011). Building Multicultural Teams: Applying Biblical Truth to Cultural Differences. Pasadena: William Carey International University Press.
Strandell, J. (2017) “The Cultural Schema: Towards Conceptual Compatibility in Culture- Cognition Interaction” in Culture-Cognition Interaction: Bridging Cognitive Science and Cultural Sociology. Doctoral dissertation, University of Copenhagen.
Strauss, C., & N. Quinn (1998). A Cognitive Theory of Cultural Meaning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sewell, W. H., Jr. (2005). Logics of History: Social Theory and Social Transformation. University of Chicago Press.
Taylor, S. E., & J. Crocker (1981). Schematic bases of social information processing. In E. T. Higgins, C. A. Hermann, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Social cognition. The Ontario Symposium on Personality and Social Psychology: Vol. 1 (pp. 89–134). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Turner, J. C. (1994). Stereotyping and Social Reality. In P. J. Oakes, S. A. Haslam, & J. C. Turner (Eds.), Stereotyping and Social Reality (pp. 1-20). Blackwell Publishing.
Vaisey, S. (2009). “Motivation and Justification: A Dual-Process Model of Culture in Action.” American Journal of Sociology 114, no. 6: 1675-1715.
Waldrop, M. M. (1992). Complexity: The emerging science at the edge of order and chaos. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Wuthnow, R. (2007). After the Baby Boomers: How Twenty- and Thirty-Somethings Are Shaping the Future of American Religion. Princeton University Press.
Yilmaz, O. (2016). Validation of the Moral Foundations Questionnaire in Turkey and Its Relation to Cultural Schemas of Individualism and Collectivism. Personality and Individual Differences, 99, 149-154.