دبیرمقدم، محمد (1384). پژوهشهای زبانشناختی فارسی. تهران: مرکز نشر دانشگاهی.
راسخمهند، محمد (1386). «ساختار ناگذرا در فارسی». مجلۀ زبان و زبانشناسی. س1، ش1، ص1 -20.
طباطبایی، علاءالدین (1384). «فعل مرکب زبان فارسی». نامۀ فرهنگستان. ش 26، ص 26-34 .
طبیبزاده، امید (1393). دستور زبان فارسی بر اساس نظریه گروههای خودگردان در دستور وابستگی. تهران: نشر مرکز.
Comrie, B. (1989). Language universals and linguistic typology: Syntax and morphology, 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.
Cooreman, A. (1994). A functional typology of antipassives. In Barbara A. Fox and Paul J. Hopper (eds.), Voice: Form and function, 49–87. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
Croft, W. (2001). Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Croft, W. (2003). Typology and universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Croft, W. (2022). Morphosyntax: constructions of the world's languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Givón, T. (1983). Topic continuity in discourse: An introduction. In Talmy Givón (ed.), Topic continuity in Discourse: A quantitative cross-language study, vol. 3, 1–42. Typological studies in Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
Givón, T. (2001). Syntax, 2 vols. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Haspelmath, Martin, Andrea Calude, Michael Spagnol, Heiko Narrog, and Elif Bamyact. (2014). Coding causal – noncausal verb alternations: a form – frequency correspondence explanation. Journal of Linguistics 50. 587 –625
Heath, J. (1976). Antipassivization: A functional typology. In Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society, 202–211.
Hopper, P. J., & S. A. Thompson (1980). Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56(2). 251–299.
Hopper, P. J. & S. A. Thompson (1984). The discourse basis for lexical categories in universal grammar. Language 60(4). 703–752.
Lazard, G. (1998). Actancy, edited by Georg Bossong and Bernard Comrie, vol. 19. Empirical Approaches to Language Typology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Lazard, G. (2002). Transitivity revisited as an example of a more strict approach in typological research. Folia Linguistica 36 (3-4): 141-190.
Levin, B., & H. M. Rappaport (1990). Wiping the slate clean: A lexical semantic exploration. Cognition 41.123–55.
Levin, B., & H. M. Rappaport (1995). Unaccusativity: At the syntax-lexical semantics interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Levin, B. (1993). English verb classes and alternations: A preliminary investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mithun, M. (1984). The evolution of noun incorporation. Language 60. 847–894.
Polinsky, M. (2013). Antipassive constructions. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://wals.info/chapter/108.
Polinsky, M. (2017). Antipassive. In Jessica Coon, Diane Massam & Lisa Demena Travis (eds.), The Oxford handbook of ergativity, 308–331. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Silverstein, M. (1972). Chinook jargon: Language contact and the problem of multi-level generative systems. Language 48. 378–406.
Silverstein, M. (1976). Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In Robert M. W. Dixon (ed.), Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages, 112–171. Linguistic Series No. 22. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.
Tsunoda, T. (1985). Remarks on transitivity. Journal of Linguistics 21(2). 385–396.
Vigus, M. (2017). Verb marking and argument structure alternations. Presented at the 11th Conference of the Association for Linguistic Typology, Melbourne, Australia.
Vigus, M. (2018). Antipassive constructions: Correlations of form and function across languages. Linguistic Typology, 22(3), 339-384. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2018-0013
زبان و زبانشناسی