Attitudes of Tabrizi Citizens towards Dialectal Variation across East Azerbaijan Province with Focus on Linguistic Difference, correctness and Pleasantness

Document Type : .

Author

Abstract

Linguistic attitude, i.e. any type of feeling or sensation of an individual towards his or her own language and that of others, involves concepts such as culture, identity, and mechanisms such as language planning. In this study, considering the three parameters of linguistic difference, correctness, and pleasantness, the attitudes of Tabrizi citizens towards dialectal variation across East Azerbaijan province were evaluated. A researcher-made questionnaire with three maps of the province was presented to 384 citizens of Tabriz who speak Azeri Turkish as their first language. The participants marked their opinion towards linguistic differences with Tabrizi accent in a scale from 1 to 4. The correctness and pleasantness parameters were evaluated in a scale from 1 to 7. The statistical data shows that the proximity principle is a valid parameter, as the least differences with Tabrizi dialect were recorded in six adjacent cities. Secondly, most participants considered Tabrizi dialect as the most correct and most pleasant variety across the province. With the two exceptions of Meraghe and Bonab, other counties showed a positive correlation between correctness and pleasantness parameters. The group of females ranked Tabrizi higher in terms of correctness and pleasantness. The age group 26-45 recognized more difference between Tabrizi accent and those of other counties. The non-educated group showed more significant attention towards the pleasantness parameter. In addition to theoretical achievements in sociolinguistics and dialectology, the findings of the present study could support language planning projects and decision making in institutions such as local IRIB as well as centers for teaching Azeri Turkish.

Keywords


به فایل پی دی اف مراجعه کنید

اسماعیلی، محمدرضا، حسن بشیرنژاد و مهرداد روحی‌مقدم (1386). «بررسی جایگاه و کاربرد زبان مازندرانی و نگرش‌های گویشوران نسبت به آن در شهرستان آمل (گزارش یافته‌های یک پژوهش میدانی)».پژوهشنامۀعلوم انسانی. ش56، 28-1.
افخمی، علی، و نگار داوری اردکانی (1384). «برنامه‌ریزی زبان و نگرش‌های زبانی».مجلۀ دانشکدۀ ادبیات و علوم انسانی. دورۀ 56، ش174، 23-1.
داوری اردکانی، نگار (1388). «برنامه‌ریزی زبان، فرهنگ زبانی و مؤلفه‌های آن (مطالعه‌ای موردی در شهر تهران)».فصلنامۀ تحقیقات فرهنگی. دورۀ2، ش1، 121-99.
مدرّسی، یحیی (1387). درآمدی بر جامعه‌شناسی زبان. تهران: پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی.
 
Berns, M. & K. Matsuda (2006). „Applied linguistics: Overview and history”. In K. Brown (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Oxford: Elsevier, 394-405.
Bhatia, T.K. (2006). “Bilingualism and second language learning”. In K. Brown (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Oxford: Elsevier,16-22.
Chambers, J.K., &P. Trudgill (2004). Dialectology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dailey-O’Cain, J. (1999). “The perception of post-unification German regional speech”. In D. R. Preston (Ed.), Handbook of Perceptual Dialectology(Vol.1). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 227-242.
Demirci, M. & B. Kleiner (1999). “The Perception of Turkish Dialects”. In D. R. Preston (Ed.), Handbook of Perceptual Dialectology (Vol.1). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 263-282.
Hartley, L.C. (1999). “A view from the West: Perceptions of U.S. dialects by Oregon residents”. In D. R. Preston (Ed.), Handbook of Perceptual Dialectology (Vol 1). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 315-332.
Kuiper, L. (2005). “Perception is reality: Parisian and Provençal perceptions of regional varieties of French”. Journal of Sociolinguistics. 9(1), 28-52.
Long, D. &Y. C. Yim (2002). “Regional differences in the perception of Korean dialects”. In D. Long & D. R. Preston (Eds.), Handbook of Perceptual Dialectology (Vol.2). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 249-275.
Montgomery, C. (2012). “The effect of proximity in perceptual dialectology”. Journal of Sociolinguistics. 16(5), 638-668.
Wolfram, W. (1969). A sociolinguistic description of Detroit Negro speech. Washington, D. C.: Center for Applied Linguistics.