مقدمه‌ای بر روش کیفی نظریه‌سازی داده‌بنیاد

نوع مقاله: علمی-پژوهشی

نویسنده

استادیار دانشگاه رازی کرمانشاه

چکیده

معرفی و بررسی روشهای تحقیق، از جملة مهمترین موضوعاتی است که در مجلات علمی ـ پژوهشی قابل طرح است. با توجه به رویکرد علوم انسانی ـ اجتماعی به روشهای کیفی پژوهش و نیز جایگاه ویژة روش کیفی نظریه‌سازی داده بنیاد، این مقاله به بررسی این روش می‌پردازد. در این مقاله سعی شده است نه فقط تکنیکهای مورد استفاده در این روش معرفی گردند، بلکه جایگاه معرفت‌شناسی آن نیز مورد بررسی قرار گیرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

An Introduction to Grounded Theory

نویسنده [English]

  • Mostafa Hasrati
چکیده [English]

This paper is an attempt to introduce Grounded Theory (Glaser and Strauss 1967; Glaser 1992), which is among the most important qualitative research traditions. It will not only refer to techniques used in this method, but it will also analyse its underlying epistemological orientations (Schwandt 2000; Schweizer 1998). It will mainly focus on two different version of Grounded Theory, namely the positivist and the social constructivist (Charmaz 2000). Finally, it will situate grounded theory within the social turn movement (Gee 2000) in the social sciences / humanities and will argue for its application in a number of sociolinguistic areas of research.

به فایل پی دی اف مراجعه شود.

-   Agar, M. The professional stranger: An informal introduction to ethnography. San Diego and London: Academic Press, 1996.

-   Charmaz, K. The grounded theory method: An explication and interpretation. In Glaser, B. (Ed.) More grounded theory methodology. Mill Valley; CA: Sociology Press, 1994:  95-115.

-   Charmaz, K. Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In Denzin, N.K., and Lincoln, Y.S. (Eds.) Handbook of qualitative research. London: Sage, 2000.

-   Charmaz, K.The grounded theory method: An explication and  interpretation. In Glaser, B. (Ed.) More grounded theory methodology.Mill Valley; CA: Sociology Press, 1994:  95-115.

-   Charmaz, K. Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In Denzin, N.K., and Lincoln, Y.S. (Eds.) Handbook of  qualitative research. London: Sage, 2000.

-   Einstein, A. Essays in science. New York: The Philosophical  Library, 1934.

-   Gee, J. P. The new literacy studies. In Barton, D., Hamilton, M., and Ivanic, R. (Eds.) London and New York: Routledge, 2000.

-   Glaser, B. G. Basics of grounded theory analysis. Mill Valley, CA, Sociology Press, 1992.

-   Glaser, B.G., and Strauss, A.L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine, 1967.  

-   Griffiths, M. Educationa research for social justice. Buckinghan, Philadelphia: Open university press, 1998.

-   Haddan, S.C., and Lester, M. Grounded theory methodology as a  resource for doing ethnomethodology. In Glaser, B. (Ed.) More  grounded theory methodology. Valley, CA: Sociology Press, 1994: 159 - 180.

-   Hammersley, M. What's wrong with ethnography? London and New York: Routledge, 1992.

-   Hasrati, M. Legitimate peripheral participation and supervising Ph.D. students. Studies in Higher Education Vol 30, No. 5.2005. pp. 557 - 570.

-   Lave, J., and Wenger, E. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral  participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.

-   Latour, B., and Woolgar, S. Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific acts. Beverly Hills, London: Sage publication, 1979.

-   Schweizer, T. Epistemology: The nature and validation of epistemological knowledge. In Bernard, H. Russell (ed.). Handbook of Methods in Cultural Anthropology. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press, 1998.

-   Stern, P. N. Grounded theory methodology: Its uses and processes In Glaser, B. (Ed.) More grounded theory methodology. Mill Valley: CA: Sociology Press, 1994: 116-126.

-   Wiliam, D. A framework for thinking about research in education. Paper Presented in Research Training Workshop for PhD Students at  King’s College London. October 1999.

-   Wolcott, H. Transforming qualitative data: Description, analysis and Interpretation. London: Sage, 1994.

-   Wenger, E. Communities of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge  University Press, 1998.