<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Linguistics Society of Iran</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Language and Linguistics</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>23223847</Issn>
				<Volume>3</Volume>
				<Issue>6</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2007</Year>
					<Month>11</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>The Effect of Aspiration on Persian Stop Voicing Contrast</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>The Effect of Aspiration on Persian Stop Voicing Contrast</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>65</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>84</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">1648</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Vahid</FirstName>
					<LastName>Sadeghi</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2015</Year>
					<Month>08</Month>
					<Day>08</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		    <Abstract>There are two competing views concerning the phonological interpretation of voiceless stops following voiceless fricatives (SCV where S: a voiceless fricative; C: a voiceless stop, and V: a vowel).One view suggests that voiceless stops become voiced in SCV as their noise offset time decreases. The second view maintains that the voicing/aspiration contrast in stops is neutralized following voiceless fricatives where the relevant NOT (noise offset time) values characterizing voiced and voiceless stops cannot be maintained or carried out.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">There are two competing views concerning the phonological interpretation of voiceless stops following voiceless fricatives (SCV where S: a voiceless fricative; C: a voiceless stop, and V: a vowel).One view suggests that voiceless stops become voiced in SCV as their noise offset time decreases. The second view maintains that the voicing/aspiration contrast in stops is neutralized following voiceless fricatives where the relevant NOT (noise offset time) values characterizing voiced and voiceless stops cannot be maintained or carried out.</OtherAbstract>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://lsi-linguistics.ihcs.ac.ir/article_1648_7437d136770f5b35194cb46c1653efaa.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
