<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Linguistics Society of Iran</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Language and Linguistics</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>23223847</Issn>
				<Volume>8</Volume>
				<Issue>15</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2012</Year>
					<Month>03</Month>
					<Day>20</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Classifying Persian Derivational Affixes</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Classifying Persian Derivational Affixes</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>125</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>138</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">1403</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Giti</FirstName>
					<LastName>Taki</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2011</Year>
					<Month>04</Month>
					<Day>25</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>There are different ways to classify derivational affixes. This article investigates Persian derivational affixes according to the classification presented by Beard (2001). His classification is different from others in considering the affixes’ features, semantic functions, and grammatical changes. The problems and the limitations of this classification in Persian are also discussed here. Moreover, based on Beard’s theory on derivational head (which suggests that if affixes are lexical items selected for phrase structures, they should be served as heads), the derivational head in Persian is discussed together with the inadequacy of this theory. To overcome some of these shortcomings, the present study suggests at least three additional classes of derivation: Archi derivation (including several classes), semantic derivation (changing just the function) and referent derivation (changing just the reference)</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">There are different ways to classify derivational affixes. This article investigates Persian derivational affixes according to the classification presented by Beard (2001). His classification is different from others in considering the affixes’ features, semantic functions, and grammatical changes. The problems and the limitations of this classification in Persian are also discussed here. Moreover, based on Beard’s theory on derivational head (which suggests that if affixes are lexical items selected for phrase structures, they should be served as heads), the derivational head in Persian is discussed together with the inadequacy of this theory. To overcome some of these shortcomings, the present study suggests at least three additional classes of derivation: Archi derivation (including several classes), semantic derivation (changing just the function) and referent derivation (changing just the reference)</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">derivational affix‌-featural</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">functional</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">transpositional</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">and expressive derivation-derivational head</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">http://lsi-linguistics.ihcs.ac.ir/article_1403_8baa961551c78e168e7ec8d6ca0c89ab.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
